A fiery debate has taken over the internet after a business owner posed a simple yet controversial question: Should employees get time off when they bring home a new pet?
For those unfamiliar with the term, “pawternity leave” is exactly what it sounds like—leave for pet parents, similar to maternity or paternity leave for new human parents. Some believe that bringing home a puppy (or any pet) is a big life change that deserves employer support. Others think it’s just another example of entitlement gone too far.
And now, thanks to UK-based CEO Roger Wade, this debate is front and center.
One Simple Question, 34,000 Answers
Wade took to LinkedIn to ask: “One of my staff has asked for paternity leave because he has a new puppy. What do you think?”
He posted a poll with a straightforward choice—Yes or No. The response? Over 34,000 votes later, the results were in:
- 61% said No, workers should not get “pawternity” leave.
- 39% said Yes, employees deserve time off to adjust to life with a new pet.
But the conversation didn’t end there. The comments section turned into a battleground of opinions.
The Case for ‘Pawternity’ Leave
Supporters of pet leave argue that bringing home a new animal is a major adjustment—one that affects both sleep and daily routines.
One commenter passionately defended the idea:
“To that employee with the new puppy, what better opportunity to do something meaningful for them than to at least consider some flexible working? Bringing a new pup into your household is a huge adjustment. And just think—how much goodwill could be gained by supporting your employee?”
Another pet owner shared their personal struggle:
“New puppy owner here, currently on week 4 of sleepless nights, cleaning up messes, and juggling work. I would have loved a few days off to catch up on sleep and settle my new family member! Like many millennials, I can’t afford to raise a child in London, so a pet is the next best thing.”
The Argument Against It
On the other side of the debate, many saw “pawternity” leave as unrealistic.
One person bluntly stated:
“The world has officially gone mad. 39% of people actually think it’s okay to get time off for a dog! People feel entitled to everything these days. If your work situation doesn’t allow for a pet, don’t get one.”
Another LinkedIn user added:
“If you seriously think your employer should pay for two weeks off just because you chose to get a pet, you might want to reconsider your priorities.”
But this take was met with an interesting counterpoint:
“You also CHOSE to have a child, yet expect your employer to cover you for a few weeks when you bring them home.”
Where Do You Stand?
So, is “pawternity” leave a thoughtful workplace benefit or an unreasonable request? Should employers offer some flexibility, or is this a step too far?
Let us know your thoughts! Would you take “pawternity” leave if it were offered?
